Economic Implications of Protecting Regional Reputations

Author:

Winfree Jason A.1,McCluskey Jill J.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology , University of Idaho , 875 Perimeter Drive MS 2334 , Moscow , ID 83844 , USA

2. School of Economic Sciences , Washington State University , Pullman , WA 99164 , USA

Abstract

Abstract This article develops a theoretical model to analyze how policies such as regional labeling, geographic indications, and quality standards affect welfare when firms have a collective reputation corresponding to a region. The tradeoff is between consumer information and protection of the regional names against the effect of supply restriction, which is often considered to be collusive behavior. Regional labeling is found to increase quality for all firms and increases profits for firms in the high-quality producing region, although the effect on profits for firms in the low-quality producing region is ambiguous. Quality standards may also increase quality and profits in all regions, but can also be used as a way to restrict imports if standards are too high. Quotas can also alleviate the collective information problem and increase profits, but does so at the expense of consumers. We argue that clear labeling and achievable standards are preferable to import quotas due to consumer surplus.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Food Science

Reference27 articles.

1. Bingaman, Anne K. and Robert E. Litan. 1993. Call for Additional Proposals for a Marketing Order for Red Tart Cherries under the Agricultural Marketing Order Act: Comments of the Department of Justice, Antitrust Documents Group, U.S. Department of Justice.

2. Bockstael, Nancy E. 1984. “The Welfare Implications of Minimum Quality Standards.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 466–71.

3. Fleckinger, Pierre. 2007. Collective Reputation and Market Structure: Regulating the Quality vs. Quantity Trade-off, discussion paper, Ecole Polytechnique.

4. Gardner, Bruce. 2003. “U.S. Food Quality Standards: Fix for Market Failure or Costly Anachronism?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 723–30.

5. Jaleshgari, Ramin P. 1997. “L.I. Potato Packager and Idaho at War.” The New York Times, Accessed April 21, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/09/nyregion/li-potato-packager-and-idaho-at-war.html.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Food Origin Labeling and “Promoting Competition”;Review of Industrial Organization;2023-09-28

2. Collective reputation and food;Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy;2022-05-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3