Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management of Nabeul, ENVIE, University of Carthage , Tunis , Tunisia
Abstract
Abstract
The paper analyzes the economic impact of the gradual removal of the subsidy in the bakery sector in Tunisia. A partial equilibrium model under imperfect competition in the soft wheat market is developed to evaluate the impact of the gradual removal of the subsidy in the Tunisian bakery sector. Two scenarios are simulated. In the first scenario, the subsidy is eliminated over a three years, starting in 2024. Scenario 2 mirrors scenario 1, but assumes a 5 % annual increase in the world price of soft wheat from 2024 to 2026, accounting for the anticipated depreciation of the Tunisian currency. The results show that the overall welfare would increase under both scenarios 1 and 2, and range between 443.9 and 472.2 million dinars by 2026, respectively. Based on the results of the simulations, to mitigate the negative impact of subsidy removal, it is strongly recommended to extend the food subsidy reform to a five-year period, prioritizing the protection of low-income segments. In addition, abolishing the Cereal Board’s regulatory role and moving to a competitive farm-level market would enhance competition, attract investment, and improve productivity and efficiency. However, a new cereal policy should be implemented to achieve objectives of food security, improved productivity, sustainability, and resilience.
Reference20 articles.
1. Abbassi, A., B. Olivier, and J. P. Gervais. 2008. “Dairy Trade Liberalization Impacts in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 56: 315–335.
2. Abbassi, A., A. Dakhlaoui, and L. Tamini. 2020. “Minimum Price Policy Impact in the Tunisian Dairy Sector.” Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies 10 (5): 573–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/jadee-05-2019-0077.
3. African Development Bank. 2013. Subventions alimentaires et aides sociales directes: vers un meilleur ciblage de la pauvreté monétaire et des privations en Tunisie. https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Procurement/Project-related-Procurement/Subventions_alimentaires_et_aides_sociales_directes__vers_un_meilleur_ciblage_de_la_pauvreté_monétaire_et_des_privations_en_Tunisie.pdf.
4. Ayatollah, K., E. Abdoulkarim, and N. Bahadin. 2012. “Assessing Effects of Alternative Food Subsidy Reform in Iran.” Journal of Policy Modeling 34: 788–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.08.002.
5. Bouamra-Mechemache, Z., J-P. Chavas, T. Cox, and V. Réquillart. 2002. “EU Dairy Policy Reform and Future WTO Negotiations: A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 53 (2): 233–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2002.tb00019.x.