Affiliation:
1. Institute of Foreign Philosophy, Peking University , 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District , Beijing , 100871 , China
Abstract
Abstract
This paper argues that accepting an ordinary approach to truthmakers and rejecting something I call “the metaphysical knowledge assumption” (MKA) allows us to account for inquiry in terms of truthmaking. §1 introduces inquiry and the potential place of truthmakers in inquiry. §2 presents the relevant ordinary notion of truthmakers. §3 presents and motivates MKA. This assumption, I argue (§4), makes a truthmaker-focused account of inquiry whose objects are not the fundamental nature of things impossible and thus should be rejected. The ordinary picture, which understands truthmakers not exclusively in terms of the objects of fundamental reality or of semantics (§5), but in terms of the relevant, intentional objects of inquiry, gives us an attractive, general, truthmaker-based view of inquiry.
Reference57 articles.
1. Aristotle. 350BCE/1924. Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Armstrong, D. M. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Asay, J. 2020. A Theory of Truthmaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Austin, J. L. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bacon, F. 1620/2000. The New Organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献