Affiliation:
1. TIB – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Technik und Naturwissenschaften Direktor der TIB , Welfengarten 1 B , Hannover Germany
2. TIB – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Technik und Naturwissenschaften , Welfengarten 1 B , Hannover Germany
Abstract
AbstractThe transfer of knowledge has not changed fundamentally for many hundreds of years: It is usually document-based-formerly printed on paper as a classic essay and nowadays as PDF. With around 2.5 million new research contributions every year, researchers drown in a flood of pseudo-digitized PDF publications. As a result research is seriously weakened. In this article, we argue for representing scholarly contributions in a structured and semantic way as a knowledge graph. The advantage is that information represented in a knowledge graph is readable by machines and humans. As an example, we give an overview on the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG), a service implementing this approach. For creating the knowledge graph representation, we rely on a mixture of manual (crowd/expert sourcing) and (semi-)automated techniques. Only with such a combination of human and machine intelligence, we can achieve the required quality of the representation to allow for novel exploration and assistance services for researchers. As a result, a scholarly knowledge graph such as the ORKG can be used to give a condensed overview on the state-of-the-art addressing a particular research quest, for example as a tabular comparison of contributions according to various characteristics of the approaches. Further possible intuitive access interfaces to such scholarly knowledge graphs include domain-specific (chart) visualizations or answering of natural language questions.
Reference12 articles.
1. Ammar, W.; Groeneveld, D.; Bhagavatula, C.; Beltagy, I.; Crawford, M.; Downey, D.; Dunkelberger, J.; Elgohary, A.; Feldman, S.; Ha, V.A.; Kinney, R.M.; Kohlmeier, S.; Lo, K.; Murray, T.C.; Ooi, H.; Peters, M. E.; Power, J.L.; Skjonsberg, S.; Wang, L.L.; Wilhelm, C.; Yuan, Z.; Zuylen, M.V.; Etzioni, O. (2018): Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholar. NAACL-HLT.
2. Aryani, Amir (2014): Research Linking Initiative: Toward Interoperability of Research Data. figshare. Journal contribution. Available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1170011.v1.
3. Baker, M. (2016): 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. New York: Nature.
4. Brack, A.; D’Souza, J.; Hoppe, A.; Auer, S.; Ewerth, R. (2020): Domain-Independent Extraction of Scientific Concepts from Research Articles. In: European Conference on Information Retrieval ECIR, (1), 251–66.
5. Corrêa, A.S.; Zander, P.O. (2017): Unleashing tabular content to open data: A survey on pdf table extraction methods and tools. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 54–63.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献