Affiliation:
1. VID Specialized University , Oslo , Norway
Abstract
Abstract
Fencing for the blind and visually impaired is an emerging sub-discipline of fencing that creates unusual conditions for meaning-making through interaction between embodied endowments and worldly affordances. With the rules of fencing slightly adjusted to the needs of the blindfolded participants – regardless of their sightedness – the discipline requires the fencers to engage in a duel by relying on other than visual cues. This article explores what an autoethnographic account of experiences of participation in fencing for the blind and visually impaired brings to debates on the embodied, and specifically sensory difference. The discussion of these experiences intersects with debates on affect, affordance, and habit, with all three having important roles in related semiotic processes. Presented vignettes draw upon the author’s lived experiences of participation in fencing for the blind and visually impaired and are analyzed as part of a mixed-method autoethnographic study, accompanied by sensory methodologies, with a focus on an inquiry beyond the visual. The vignettes elucidate how we make sense of our surroundings through a complex engagement with the ecology of sensory and affective processes. In addition to exploring the role of affective and pre-conceptual aspects of our experiences, the article seeks to understand how semiosis occurs through both exposure to as well as the active pursuit of specific environmental signs available to us. The article also derives from biosemiotics to examine the complex relationship between meaning-making processes and habits. Finally, the autoethnographic account provides an insight into how we habituate the world and our embodied differences and thus enable meaning-making processes.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference49 articles.
1. Adams, Tony E., Carolyn Ellis & Stacy Holman Jones. 2017. Autoethnography. In Jörg Matthes, Robert F. Potter & Christine S. Davis (eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
2. Allen-Collinson, Jacquelyn & Helen Owton. 2015. Intense embodiment senses of heat in women’s running and boxing. Body and Society 21(2). 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x14538849.
3. Bissell, David. 2015. Virtual infrastructures of habit: The changing intensities of habit through gracefulness, restlessness, and clumsiness. Cultural Geographies 22(1). 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013482812.
4. Blackman, Lisa. 2013. Habit and affect: Revitalizing a forgotten history. Body and Society 19(2–3). 186–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x12472546.
5. Blackman, Lisa & Venn Couze. 2010. Affect. Body and Society 16(1). 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x09354769.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献