Can we really free ourselves from stereotypes? A semiotic point of view on clichés and disability studies

Author:

Paolucci Claudio1,Martinelli Paolo1,Bacaro Martina1

Affiliation:

1. University of Bologna , Bologna , Italy

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we try to build a semiotics of stereotypes through the key idea of enunciation. We investigate stereotypes of Persons with Disabilities in the context of social media networks (e.g., Facebook, Instagram) by adopting a semiotic perspective. The mainstream idea about stereotypes is that they are necessarily something negative, that must be avoided to maximize inclusivity and fairness. However, in our view, stereotypes are the background of our perception of the world, and we cannot escape from them, because when we leave behind a stereotype, it is only for adopting a new one built on a different basis. Therefore, it is crucial to understand stereotypes and the way they are expressed, since they are one of the enunciating instances that circulate in the space of the Encyclopedia. Through a semiotic point of view, we will follow how stereotypes transform, showing the way they change the modes of existence of meanings, shifting between the virtualized, the potentialized, the actualized, and the realized. Analyzing a huge corpus of social network messages built by the partners of the European project MeMe (Me & the Media: Fostering Social Media Literacy competences through Interactive Learning Settings for Adults with Disabilities), we will show how the advent of social media affected the research field of disability studies. Later, we will point out the variations of the classic stereotypes that have been addressed in the new participatory context of social media through the semiotic theory of enunciation.

Funder

Erasmus+Action type: KA2 Strategic Partnerships for adult education

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference36 articles.

1. Bartezzaghi, Stefano. 2019. Banalità. Milano: Bompiani.

2. Boxall, Kathy. 2019. Revisiting the foundations of (critical) disability studies: Manifesto for an inclusive social model. In Katie Ellis, Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, Mike Kent & Rachel Robertson (eds.), Manifestos for the future of critical disability studies, vol. 1, 199–208. New York: Routledge.

3. Briant, Emma, Nicholas Watson & Gregory Philo. 2013. Reporting disability in the age of austerity: The changing face of media representation of disability and disabled people in the United Kingdom and the creation of new “folk devils”. Disability & Society 28. 874–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.813837.

4. Bruns, Axel. 2018. Gatewatching and news curation: Journalism, social media, and the public sphere. New York: Peter Lang.

5. Carlson, Licia. 2010. The faces of intellectual disability. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3