Affiliation:
1. Université Sorbonne-Nouvelle , Paris , France
Abstract
Abstract
In his De philosophia, Varro lists 288 philosophical schools on the highest good before presenting Antiochus’s doctrine as the only true one. One of the particularities of his moral doxography consists in including cynicism which has never been mentioned in the previous moral sources. This paper therefore aims to show that the De philosophia represents a major turning point for the Roman reflection on cynicism. First, Varro defines cynicism as a simple way of life (habitus) and not a doctrine (ratio) so that it could be adopted by all other philosophies. In fact, by ‘reducing’ cynicism to a way of life Varro makes it compatible with his conception of the highest good based on social duties. In that respect, his position on cynicism is opposite to Cicero’s who, in his De officiis, considers cynicism as a dangerous philosophy for Roman values. Finally, Varro uses cynicism as a conceptual tool for thinking, in philosophical terms, one of the most important issues that run through all his work: the relationship between happiness and Ancient Roman simplicity, especially in the context of Roman decadency. For instance, in Varro’s Menippean Satires, Cynics’s destitution partly reminds of the Ancient Romans’ austerity. Therefore, by mentioning cynicism in his moral doxography, Varro gives an original and Roman treatment of the Antiochian inquiry into the concept highest good.
Reference44 articles.
1. Algra, K. 1997. “Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero and the Ethical Diuisiones in Cicero’s Lucullus.” In Assent and Argument. Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books. Proceeding Of the 7th Symposium Hellenisticum (Utrecht, August 21–25, 1995), edited by J. Mansfeld, et B. Inwood, 107–39. Leiden–New York–Cologne: Brill.
2. Astbury, R. 2002. M. Terentius Varro: Saturarum Menippearum Fragmenta, 2nd ed. Munich–Leipzig: K.G. Saur.
3. Bardy, G., Combès, G. 1960. La Cité de Dieu : livres XV-XVIII. Luttes des deux cités, texte de la 4e éd. de B. Dombart et A. Kalb; introd. générale et notes par G. Bardy; trad. française de G. Combès. Paris: Desclée, De Brouwer et Cie.
4. Bénatouïl, Th., et M. Bonazzi (éds). 2012. Theoria, Praxis and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle. Leiden–Boston: Brill.
5. Bettini, M. 2000. “Mos, mores e mos maiorum. L’invenzione dei ‘buoni costumi’ nella cultura romana.” In Id., Le orecchie di Hermes. Studi di antropologia e letterature classiche, 241–92. Torino: Einaudi.