Aux limites de l’explication : le rôle de la sympathie chez Galien

Author:

Devinant Julien1

Affiliation:

1. Centre Léon Robin – Sorbonne Université , Paris , France

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to assess the epistemological value of the notion of sympathy in Galen’s thought. It first shows that Galen makes use of two different concepts of sympathy: the ambient concept, according to which the human body manifests a harmonious part-whole relationship, and the technical concept, with which one connects two pathologies on the basis of the fact that the cause of the ailment is elsewhere than where it surfaces. Neither of these sympathies constitutes in itself a causal explanation of reality. The first merely acknowledges an obvious interrelationship, the second acts as an epistemic tool to shift the focus of diagnosis away from the place where the condition manifests itself. However, the two concepts are not absolutely unrelated; and they come together when the sympathetic paradigm is used to understand the unifying action of the psychic and natural faculties. Very significantly, Galen then provisionally defines the cause as a power or faculty (δύναμις) not out of theoretical necessity but for practical reasons.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy,Classics

Reference64 articles.

1. Berryman, S. 2002. “Galen and the Mechanical Philosophy.” Apeiron. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 35 (3) : 235–54 https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron.2002.35.3.235.

2. Boudon-Millot, V. 2001. “Galien face à la ‘peste antonine’ ou comment penser l’invisible.” In Air, miasmes et contagion. Les Épidémies dans l’Antiquité et au Moyen Âge, edited by S. Bazin-Tacchella, D. Quéruel, and É. Samama, 29–54. Langres: Guéniot.

3. Brouwer, R. 2015. “Stoic Sympathy.” In Sympathy, edited by E. Schliesser, 15–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Burkert, W. 1961. “Hellenistische Pseudopythagorica.” Philologus. Zeitschrift für Klassische Philologie 105 (1–2): 16–43 et 226–46, https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.1961.105.12.16.

5. Chiaradonna, R. 2014. “Galen on What is Persuasive (Pithanon) and What Approximates to Truth.” In Philosophical Themes in Galen, edited by P. Adamson, R. E. Hansberger, and J. Wilberdin (BICS Supplement 114), 61–88. London: Institute of Classical Studies.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3