Platonismo e aristotelismo nel<i>Timaeus</i>di Cicerone-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Platonismo e aristotelismo nelTimaeusdi Cicerone

Published:2022-11-17 Issue:2 Volume:43 Page:249-278
ISSN:0392-7342
Container-title:Elenchos
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Brumana Selene I. S.¹²

Affiliation:

1. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano , Milan , Italy

2. Università degli Studi di Padova , Padua , Italy

Abstract

AbstractCicero’sTimaeuslegitimately stands as the first Latin exegesis of the Platonic dialogue. I shall deal with the interpretation of §§19–21, a passage that departs significantly from the Greek text in several respects. The aim of this paper is to explore the role Aristotelianism might have played in Cicero’sTimaeus. Among the points that support such an analysis is the mention of the Peripatetic Cratippus in the prologue. The interpretative scenario I suggest considers both Cratippus’ role and Antiochus’s philosophical system with its agreement between Platonism and Aristotelianism.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy,Classics

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/elen-2022-0015/pdf

Reference105 articles.

1. Alesse, F. 1997. Panezio di Rodi. Testimonianze. Napoli: Bibliopolis.

2. Alfonsi, L. 1961. “Cicerone filosofo (Linee per lo studio del suo ‘iter’ speculativo).” Studi Romani 9: 127–34.

3. Altman, W. H. F. 2016. The Revival of Platonism in Cicero’s Late Philosophy. Platonis aemulus and the Invention of Cicero. Lanham: Lexington Books.

4. André, J.-M. 2013. “L’héritage aristotélicien à Rome des origines à l’ère antonine.” In Aristoteles Romanus. La réception de la science aristotélicienne dans l’Empire gréco-romain, edited by Y. Lehmann, 1–57. Turnhout: Brepols.

5. Aronadio, F. 2007. “Il Timaeus ciceroniano.” In La personalità filosofica di Marco Tullio Cicerone, edited by P. Ciaravolo, 85–103. Roma: Aracne.