Affiliation:
1. Università degli Studi di Torino , Turin , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to provide a new reading of Plato’s precosmos (Ti. 52d2–53c3). More specifically, I shall argue that the precosmos is populated by bodies deriving from random complexes of properties, and that this is the effect of the Receptacle’s full precosmic participation in the Paradigm. This will turn out to be consistent with a robust notion of ‘precosmic generation’ and will reveal why Plato may have sought to refer to this otherwise puzzling scenario: representing the precosmos in this way allows Plato to effectively justify why the Demiurge is responsible only for the goodness and perfection of the universe, and why it is properly the best possible cause.
Reference41 articles.
1. Ademollo, F. 2018. “On Plato’s Conception of Change.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 35–83.
2. Algra, K. 1995. Concepts of Space in Greek Thought. Leiden: Brill.
3. Baltes, M. 1996. “Γέγονεν (Platon Tim. 28b7). Ist die Welt real entstanden oder nicht?” In Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy, edited by K. Algra, J. Mansfeld, K. Algra, P. van der Horst, and D. T. Runia, 76–96. Leiden: Brill.
4. Baltes, M., and M.-L. Lakmann. 2005. “Idea (Dottrina Della Idee).” In Eidos-Idea. Platone, Aristotele e la tradizione platonica, edited by F. Fronterotta, and W. Leszl, 1–23. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
5. Betegh, G. 2010. “What Makes a Myth Eikôs?” In One Book, the Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today, edited by R. D. Mohr, and B. Sattler, 213–24. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.