Affiliation:
1. Universidade de Brasília , Brasília , Brazil
Abstract
Abstract
The doctrine of unity of opposites lays in the centre of the debate on Heraclitus’ philosophy. The present article proposes a critical analysis of the mainstream interpretation of geometrical oppositions (fragments DK 22 B 59, B 60 and B 103) as mere examples of different points of view. Instead, we suggest that these fragments are fundamental pieces in Heraclitus cosmology and that they are traces of a circular and archaic paradigm. Indeed, cyclical formulations are spread throughout the fragments and, read in connection with geometrical oppositions, perform a useful model to describe how permanence and change can be complementary events. In this context, circularity can be a key to the comprehension of unity of opposites as a result of interchangeable processes – as day and night, life and death, beginning and end – so that opposites are part of a concrete and vital unity.
Reference38 articles.
1. Bergson, H. 2000. Cours sur la philosophie grecque: Cours IV. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
2. Bernabé, A. 2009. “Expresiones Polares en Heráclito.” In Nuevos Ensayos sobre Heráclito. Actas del Segundo Symposium Heracliteum, edited by E. Hülsz Piccone, 103–37. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
3. Betegh, B. 2007. “On the Physical Aspect of Heraclitus’ Psychology.” Phronesis 52: 3–32.
4. Betegh, B. 2009. “The Limits of the Soul: Heraclitus B 45 DK. Its Text and Interpretation.” In Nuevos Ensayos sobre Heráclito: Actas del Segundo Symposium Heracliteum, edited by E. Hülsz Piccone, 391–414. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
5. Betegh, G., and V. Piano. 2019. “Column IV of the Derveni Papyrus: A New Analysis of the Text and the Quotation of Heraclitus.” In Presocratics and Papyrological Tradition: A Philosophical Reappraisal of the Sources, edited by C. Vassallo, 179–220. Berlin: De Gruyter.