Affiliation:
1. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge , MA , USA
Abstract
Abstract
What is the best method for undertaking critical social theory, and what are its ontological and normative commitments? Andreas Reckwitz has developed compelling answers to these questions drawing on practice theory. As a practice theorist myself, I am very sympathetic to his approach. This paper sketches a social theory that extends the reach of practice theory to include non-human animals and allows us to discriminate between importantly different kinds of social formations. In doing so, I argue that a strongly normative basis for differentiating social phenomena is compatible with the methods of social theory and critical social theorists need not shy away from first-order moral commitments.
Subject
Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Althusser, L. 1971/2014. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses,” Trans. B. Brewster. In On the Reproduction of Capitalism. London: Verso, 232–72.
2. Anderson, E. 1995. “Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 27–58. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics199523213.
3. Anderson, E. 2020. “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Also available at .
4. Andrews, K. 2020. The Animal Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Animal Cognition, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
5. Balkin, J. M. 1998. Cultural Software: A Theory of Ideology. New Haven: Yale University Press.