Why Realists Need Tropes

Author:

Keinänen Markku1,Hakkarainen Jani2,Keskinen Antti2

Affiliation:

1. University of Helsinki, PL 24 (Unioninkatu 40 A, 6. krs), 00014 Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki, Finland

2. School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Philosophy, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Abstract

Abstract We argue that if one wishes to be a realist, one should adopt a realist ontology involving tropes instead of a Russellian ontology of property universals and objects. Either Russellian realists should adopt relata-specific relational tropes of instantiation instead of facts, or, better, convert to Neo-Aristotelian realism with monadic tropes. Regarding Neo-Aristotelian realism, we have two novel points why it fares better than Russellian realism. (1) Instantiation of property universals by tropes, and characterisation or inherence between tropes and objects, are more transparent ontological notions than relational inherence, which is assumed in Russellian realism with the relational tropes of instantiation. (2) Neo-Aristotelian realism makes better sense about abstract universals, which are a more viable option than concrete universals.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy

Reference38 articles.

1. Armstrong, D. M. 1978. Nominalism and Realism, Universals and Scientific Realism, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Armstrong, D. M. 1989. Universals – An Opinionated Introduction. Boulder: Westview Press.

3. Armstrong, D. M. 1997. The World States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Armstrong, D. M. 2004. Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Bergmann, G. 1967. Realism – A Critique of Brentano and Meinong. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3