Author:
Eleje George Uchenna,Ezugwu Euzebus Chinonye,Eke Ahizechukwu Chigoziem,Ikechebelu Joseph Ifeanyichukwu,Obiora Chukwudi Celestine,Ojiegbe Nnabuike Okechukwu,Ezebialu Ifeanyichukwu Uzoma,Ezeama Chukwuemeka Okwudili,Nwosu Betrand Obi,Udigwe Gerald Okanandu,Okafor Charles Ikechukwu,Ezugwu Frank Okechukwu
Abstract
AbstractPurpose:To determine the diagnostic accuracy of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1/alpha fetoprotein (Amnioquick duo+Methods:A double-blinded, multicenter clinical study was conducted between February 2015 and August 2015 among pregnant women presenting with symptoms or features suggestive of PROM between 24 and 42 weeks gestation. Confirmation of PROM was done after delivery based on the presence of any two of these criteria: delivery within 48 h to 7 days, evidence of chorioamnionitis, membranes explicitly ruptured at delivery and adverse perinatal outcomes strongly correlated with prolonged PROM. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were outcome measures assessed.Results:Two hundred and thirty-six women were recruited. Three women were excluded from the final analysis due to lack of follow-up data and failure to meet inclusion criteria. Two hundred and thirty-three women had complete data for analysis. The specificity and sensitivity values for TCA were 76.2% and 85.2%, which were lower than those of Amnioquick duo+, which were 97.6% and 97.9%, respectively. The accuracy of Amnioquick duo+ was statistically higher (97.9% vs. 83.7%; RR=1.17; 95%CI=1.10–1.24; P<0.001). In equivocal cases (pooling=negative), the accuracy of Amnioquick duo+ vs. TCA was 98.4% vs. 69.4% (RR=1.42; 95%CI=1.20–1.68; P<0.001) at ≥34 weeks gestation and 100.0% vs. 71.4% (RR=1.40; 95%CI=1.07–1.83; P=0.021) at <34 weeks gestation.Conclusion:The performance matrix of Amnioquick duo+
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献