Social Innovations In Companies And In Social Economy Enterprises

Author:

Furmańska-Maruszak Agnieszka,Sudolska Agata

Abstract

This paper compares the way of perceiving and implementing social innovations in companies and social enterprises in Poland with those in Europe. Special attention is paid to internal social innovations, so-called workplace innovations (WPI), and the reasons and outcomes of their introduction in companies, both in Poland and in other European countries. Moreover, the paper investigates the relationship between the need for internal social innovations and positive employment relations in analyzed entities. The research findings prove that introducing innovations, including social innovations, is mainly driven by the need to improve a company’s performance. Among social innovations which both companies and social enterprises value is investment into improving employees’ work conditions. Moreover, for more than half of Polish companies and social enterprises the need for innovations is related to creating development opportunities, higher work flexibility, better social and life conditions of employees, as well as supporting employee’s reconciliation between work and family life. These reasons for introducing social innovations were also noted by both managers and employees in other European companies. The paper also shows the links between issues of internal social innovations and positive employment relationships. The presented research findings prove that positive relationships among employees are significantly and positively correlated with a broad approach to the need for introducing social innovations. Moreover, the paper points out that positive employment relations are perceived as an important outcome of workplace innovation practices in European companies.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Baregheh A., Rowley J., Sambrook S. (2009), Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation, ‘Management Decision’, 47 (8).

2. Bessant J., Tidd J. (2007), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Wiley, Chichester.

3. Biggs R., Westley F.R., Carpenter S.R. (2010), Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society 15(2): 9, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art9/ (05.09.2015).

4. Brouard F., Larivet S. (2009), Social enterprises: definition and boundaries, paper presented at ANSER-ARES 2009 Conference Association for Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 27–29 May, Carleton University, Ottawa.

5. Brown T.E., Ulijn J.M. (2004), Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture, a matter of interaction between technology, progress and economic growth? An Introduction, [in:] T.E. Brown & J.M. Ulijn (eds), Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture, a matter of interaction between technology, progress and economic growth: 1–38, Edward Elgar, Norhampton.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3