A cross-sectional survey exploring clinician perceptions of a novel Medicaid back pain policy
Author:
Livingston Catherine J.1ORCID, Gray Mary2, LaForge Kate2, Choo Esther K.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Emergency Medicine , Oregon Health & Science University , OR , USA 2. Comagine Health , OR , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Oregon Medicaid (Oregon Health Plan, or OHP) implemented an innovative policy in 2016 that increased coverage of evidence-based non-pharmacologic therapies (NPT, including physical therapy, massage, chiropractic, and acupuncture) while restricting opioids, epidural steroid injections, and surgeries. The objective of this study was to compare the perspectives of clinicians who see back pain patients and can prescribe pharmacologic therapies and/or refer to NPTs and clinicians who directly provide NPT therapies affected by the policy.
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey was administered to Oregon prescribing clinicians and NPT clinicians between December 2019 and February 2020. The survey was completed by 107 prescribing clinicians and 83 NPT clinicians.
Results
Prescribing clinicians and NPT clinicians had only moderate levels of familiarity with core elements of the policy. Prescribing clinicians had higher levels of frustration caring for OHP patients with back pain than NPT clinicians (83 vs. 34%, p<0.001) and were less confident in their ability to provide effective care (73 vs. 85%, p = .025). Eighty-six percent of prescribing clinicians and 83% of NPT clinicians thought active NPT treatments were effective; 74 and 70% thought passive NPT treatments were effective. Forty percent of prescribing clinicians and 25% of NPT clinicians (p<0.001) thought medically-light therapies were effective, while 29% of prescribing clinicians and 10% of NPT clinicians thought medically-intensive treatments were effective (p=0.001). Prescribing clinicians thought increased access to NPTs improved outcomes, while opinions were less consistent on the impact of restricting opioid prescribing.
Conclusions
Prescribing clinicians and NPT clinicians had varying perspectives of a Medicaid coverage policy to increase evidence-based back pain care. Understanding these perspectives is important for contextualizing policy effectiveness.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Complementary and alternative medicine
Reference47 articles.
1. Kim, LH, Vail, D, Azad, TD, Bentley, JP, Zhang, Y, Ho, AL, et al.. Expenditures and health care utilization among adults with newly diagnosed low back and lower extremity pain. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e193676. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3676. 2. Lucas, JW, Connor, EM, Bose, J. Back, lower limb, and upper limb pain among U.S. adults, 2019. NCHS Data Brief 2021;415:1–8. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:107894. 3. Chou, R, Hartung, D, Turner, J, Chan, B, Levander, X, McDonagh, M, et al.. Opioid treatments for chronic pain. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2020. 4. Krebs, EE, Gravely, A, Nugent, S, Jensen, AC, DeRonne, B, Goldsmith, ES, et al.. Effect of opioid vs. nonopioid medications on pain-related function in patients with chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain: the SPACE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319:872–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.0899. 5. Feldman, DE, Carlesso, LC, Nahin, RL. Management of patients with a musculoskeletal pain condition that is likely chronic: results from a national cross sectional survey. J Pain 2020;21:869–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2019.11.014.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|