Prospects of cell replacement therapy for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy
Author:
Shea Graham Ka Hon1ORCID, Koljonen Paul Aarne1, Chan Ying Shing2, Cheung Kenneth Man Chee1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine , The University of Hong Kong , 21 Sassoon Road , Hong Kong , China 2. School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine , The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong , China
Abstract
AbstractDegenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) presents insidiously during middle-age with deterioration in neurological function. It accounts for the most common cause of non-traumatic spinal cord injury in developed countries and disease prevalence is expected to rise with the aging population. Whilst surgery can prevent further deterioration, biological therapies may be required to restore neurological function in advanced disease. Cell replacement therapy has been inordinately focused on treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury yet holds immense promise in DCM. We build upon this thesis by reviewing the pathophysiology of DCM as revealed by cadaveric and molecular studies. Loss of oligodendrocytes and neurons occurs via apoptosis. The tissue microenvironment in DCM prior to end-stage disease is distinct from that following acute trauma, and in many ways more favourable to receiving exogenous cells. We highlight clinical considerations for cell replacement in DCM such as selection of cell type, timing and method of delivery, as well as biological treatment adjuncts. Critically, disease models often fail to mimic features of human pathology. We discuss directions for translational research towards clinical application.
Funder
Health and Medical Research Fund
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
General Neuroscience
Reference89 articles.
1. Albayar, A.A., Roche, A., Swiatkowski, P., Antar, S., Ouda, N., Emara, E., Smith, D.H., Ozturk, A.K., and Awad, B.I. (2019). Biomarkers in spinal cord injury: prognostic insights and future potentials. Front. Neurol. 10: 27, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00027. 2. Allison, D.J. and Ditor, D.S. (2015). Immune dysfunction and chronic inflammation following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 53: 14–18, https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.184. 3. Almad, A., Sahinkaya, F.R., and Mctigue, D.M. (2011). Oligodendrocyte fate after spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics 8: 262–73, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-011-0033-5. 4. Anderson, K.D., Guest, J.D., Dietrich, W.D., Bartlett Bunge, M., Curiel, R., Dididze, M., Green, B.A., Khan, A., Pearse, D.D., Saraf-Lavi, E., et al.. (2017). Safety of autologous human Schwann cell transplantation in subacute thoracic spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 34: 2950–2963, https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4895. 5. Anderson, M.A., Burda, J.E., Ren, Y., Ao, Y., O’shea, T.M., Kawaguchi, R., Coppola, G., Khakh, B.S., Deming, T.J., and Sofroniew, M.V. (2016). Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 532: 195–200, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17623.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|