Affiliation:
1. Neural Engineering and Nanobiosensors Group, Biomedical Engineering Program, Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture , American University of Beirut , Beirut 1107 2020 , Lebanon
2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine , American University of Beirut , Beirut 1107 2020 , Lebanon
Abstract
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity, affecting 2 million people annually in the US alone, with direct and indirect costs of $76.3 billion per year. TBI is a progressive disease with no FDA-approved drug for treating patients. Early, accurate and rapid diagnosis can have significant implications for successful triaging and intervention. Unfortunately, current clinical tests for TBI rely on CT scans and MRIs, both of which are expensive, time-consuming, and not accessible to everyone. Recent evidence of biofluid-based biomarkers being released right after a TBI incident has ignited interest in developing point-of-care (POC) platforms for early and on-site TBI diagnosis. These efforts face many challenges to accurate, sensitive, and specific diagnosis and monitoring of TBI. This review includes a deep dive into the latest advances in chemical, mechanical, electrical, and optical sensing systems that hold promise for TBI-POC diagnostic testing platforms. It also focuses on the performance of these proposed biosensors compared to biofluid-based orthodox diagnostic techniques in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and limits of detection. Finally, it examines commercialized TBI-POCs present in the market, the challenges associated with them, and the future directions and prospects of these technologies and the field.
Reference83 articles.
1. Abbott (2021). An easy, integrated point-of-care testing (POCT) solution for a broad range of clinical settings, Retrieved June 2021, from https://www.pointofcare.abbott/us/en/offerings/istat.
2. Adrian, H., Mårten, K., Salla, N., and Lasse, V. (2016). Biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: temporal changes in body fluids. eNeuro 3, ENEURO.0294-16.2016, https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0294-16.2016.
3. Agostini, M., Amato, F., Vieri, M.L., Greco, G., Tonazzini, I., Baroncelli, L., Caleo, M., Vannini, E., Santi, M., Signore, G., et al.. (2021). Glial-fibrillary-acidic-protein (GFAP) biomarker detection in serum-matrix: functionalization strategies and detection by an ultra-high-frequency surface-acoustic-wave (UHF-SAW) lab-on-chip. Biosens. Bioelectron. 172: 112774, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112774.
4. Alves, T.I. (2018). Brain imaging in traumatic brain injury. In: Handbook of neuroemergency clinical trials. Elsevier/Academic Press, pp. 127–138.
5. Arya, S.K., Pui, T.S., Wong, C.C., Kumar, S., and Rahman, A.R. (2013). Effects of the electrode size and modification protocol on a label-free electrochemical biosensor. Langmuir 29: 6770–6777, https://doi.org/10.1021/la401109r.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献