Opinion Events: Types and opinion markers in English social media discourse

Author:

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk Barbara1ORCID,Liebeskind Chaya2ORCID,Bączkowska Anna3ORCID,Ruzaite Jurate4ORCID,Dylgjeri Ardita5ORCID,Kazazi Ledia5ORCID,Lombart Erika6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Language and Communication, University of Applied Sciences in Konin 1, Przyjazni str . Konin , Poland

2. Institute of English and American Studies, University of Gdansk Wita Stwosza Gdańsk , Poland

3. Jerusalem College of Technology, Department of Computer Science 21 Havaad Haleumi St ., Jerusalem , Israel

4. Department of Foreign Language, Literary and Translation Studies Vytautas Magnus University K. Donelaičio g . Kaunas , Lithuania

5. Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Elbasan ‘Aleksandër Xhuvani’ Rruga ‘Ismail Zyma’ Elbasan , Albania

6. Institut Language et Communication Collège Erasme Place Cardinal Mercier 31 , , Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium

Abstract

Abstract The paper investigates various definitions of the concept of opinion as opposed to factual or evidence-based statements and proposes a taxonomy of opinions expressed in English as identified in selected social media. A discussion situates opinions in the realm of pragmatics and reaches to philosophy of language and cognitive science. The research methodology combines a thorough linguistic analysis of opinions, proposing their multifaceted taxonomy with the automatically generated lexical embeddings of positive and negative lexicon acquired from the analysed opinionated texts. As proposed, the definition of the concept of opinion is best apprehended when looked upon in terms of an opinion event, with a number of necessary conditions on the one hand, and those that are characteristic of an explicit opinion prototype on the other. Lists of opinion discourse markers show their preferential uses either in positive or negative opinionated texts; however, no sets of necessary and/or sufficient opinion markers properties have been acquired from the analysed texts. The conclusions indicate a polysemous understanding of naturally occurring social media opinionated texts and a definitional flexibility of the boundaries around lexical positive and negative types of opinion markers.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3