Affiliation:
1. Kyushu University , Fukuoka , Japan
Abstract
AbstractRelatively longer formulaic sequences are often subject to syntactic, lexical, and semantic variability, and this variability presumably connects to the development of constructional schemata and to language creativity. The present paper focuses on the formulaicity, variation, and communicative effects of the quotative phraseX ga itteta‘X was saying’ in Japanese social media posts, whose situation would become fictional or less factual depending on the nature of the subjectX. Twitter data suggest thatX ga ittetawith certain subjects (e.g., high school girls, cats, moms; see below) is more conventionalized compared to the counterpartY-tte itteta‘was saying that Y’, where Y is a quoted statement, with the same subject. Additionally, the construction accepts variation of surrounding elements to raise its fictional level. In Japanese online platforms, the schemaX ga ittetaand its formulaic instances possibly distance the quoter from the quoted statement and avoid arguments and criticisms.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Education,Language and Linguistics
Reference16 articles.
1. Couto, David Tizón. 2021. The rise of COVID ‘snowclones’ – the mother of all linguistic phrases. In The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-rise-of-covid-snowclones-the-mother-of-all-linguistic-phrases-167580 (accessed 24 September 2021).
2. Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2017. Reappraising ‘snowclones’: Replicability and construction grammar. In The book of abstracts of 14th international cognitive linguistics conference, 232–233. http://iclc14.ut.ee/sites/default/files/proovin/files/book_of_abstracts_30.06.2017.pdf (accessed 16 September 2021).
3. Goldberg, Adele E. & Laura Suttle. 2010. Construction grammar. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(4). 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.22.
4. Kirner-Ludwig, Monika. 2018. Trying to make it fit … That’s what she said: An argument for a new category on the formulaic continuum. Journal of Pragmatics 137. 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.001.
5. Langacker, Ronald W. 2003. Constructions in cognitive grammar. English Linguistics 20(1). 41–83. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.20.41.