Author:
Kartal Saip Nami,Terzi Evren,Woodward Bessie,Clausen Carol A.,Lebow Stan T.
Abstract
Abstract
The potential for extraction of copper from wood treated with micronised, nano or soluble forms of copper has been evaluated in view of chemical remediation. In focus were EDTA, oxalic acid, bioxalate, and d-gluconic acid for extraction of Cu from treated wood. Bioxalate extractions for 24 h resulted in Cu removal over 95% for all tested materials, and the effectiveness of oxalic acid extraction was very similar to that of nano-CuO-treated wood. Bioxalate was more effective than oxalic acid in removing Cu from ACQ-D, MCQ, MCA, CA-C and Cu-ethanolamine treated wood. d-gluconic acid extractions resulted in the lowest Cu removal for nano-CuO even though d-gluconic acid was effective for all other materials. As the pH of d-gluconic acid decreased, Cu removal was improved except for nano-CuO. There is no distinctive difference in Cu removal from wood treated with ACQ-D, MCQ, CA-C, MCA and Cu-ethanolamine.
Reference64 articles.
1. Chelating extraction for removal of chromium copper and arsenic from treated wood with bioxalate;Kakitani;Environ Eng Sci,2007
2. Designing a purification process for chromium copper - and arsenic - contaminated wood;Kakitani;Waste Manage,2006
3. Reuse disposal In Managing Treated Wood in Aquatic Environments Products pp;Clausen;Society,2011
4. Protection Association Standards Standard method for analysis of wood and wood treating solutions by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry;Wood;American,2012
5. III Do the unique properties of nanometals affect leachability or efficacy against fungi and termites;Kartal;Int Biodeter Biodegr,2009
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献