An Overview of Local Floodplain Administrators and Training Needs in FEMA Region 6
Author:
Siebeneck Laura1, Zavar Elyse1, Manandhar Rejina2
Affiliation:
1. Emergency Management and Disaster Science , University of North Texas , 1155 Union Circle #310637 , 76203 Denton , TX , USA 2. Emergency Management , Arkansas Tech University , 402 West O Street , 72801-8819 Russellville , AR , USA
Abstract
Abstract
The management of flood risk poses significant challenges for communities across the United States. At the forefront of managing flood risk in the U.S. are local floodplain administrators (FPAs). Despite the importance of their role in addressing flood hazards at the local level, little is known about those who serve in this capacity. Using survey data gathered from local floodplain administrators in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, this study provides an overview of floodplain administrators in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region 6. Specifically, this research examines perceived strengths and challenges of floodplain administrators in their ability to carry out their roles and responsibilities, and explores how perceived strengths and challenges in ability vary based on location, experience, and previous floodplain management training. This study provides new insights into the strengths and challenges individuals experience in this role and analyses suggest that significant differences exist in the perceived abilities of floodplain managers based on whether they work in an urban and rural setting, their years of experience, and previous training. Based on the findings, this study offers recommendations about training needs and strategies that would benefit current floodplain administrators as they enhance resilience to floods in their communities.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference36 articles.
1. Anderson, M. G., M. Steinberg, and C. Tontar. 1998. “A New Urban Revival: Floodplain Acquisition in Lawrence, Massachusetts.” Times are Changing--Flood Mitigation Technology 18: 201. 2. Association of State Floodplain Managers, Association. 2020. ASFM Mentoring Program. Madison, WI. https://www.floodsciencecenter.org/products/state-mentoring-program/ (accessed July 8, 2020). 3. Berke, P., G. Smith, D. Salvesen, W. Lyles, and D. Sandler. 2011. An Evaluation of Floodplain Management Planning Under the Community Rating System. Final Report for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security Coastal Hazard Center of Excellence. Chapel Hill, NC. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.368.8452&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed May 27, 2020). 4. Brody, S. D., J. E. Kang, and S. Bernhardt. 2010. “Identifying Factors Influencing Flood Mitigation at the Local Level in Texas and Florida: The Role of Organizational Capacity.” Natural Hazards 52 (1): 167–84, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9364-5. 5. Brody, S. D., S. P. Bernhardt, S. Zahran, and J. E. Kang. 2009. “Evaluating Local Flood Mitigation Strategies in Texas and Florida.” Built Environment 35 (4): 492–515, https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.35.4.492.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|