Abstract
Abstract
Despite sustained philosophical attention, no theory of humor claims general acceptance. Drawing on the resources provided by intentional systems theory, this article first outlines an approach to investigating humor based on the idea of a comic stance, then sketches the Dismissal Theory of Humor (DTH) that has resulted from pursuing that approach. According to the DTH, humor manifests in cases where the future-directed significance of anticipatory failures is dismissed. Mirth, on this view, is the reward people get for declining to update predictive representational schemata in ways that maximize their future-oriented value. The theory aims to provide a plausible account of the role of humor in human mental and social life, but it also aims to be empirically vulnerable, and to generate testable predictions about how the comic stance may actually be undergirded by cognitive architectures.
Reference48 articles.
1. Abelson, Robert P. 1981. “Psychological Status of the Script Concept.” American Psychologist 36(7): 715 – 29.
2. Apter, Michael J. 1991. “A Structural-Phenomenology of Play.” In Adult Play: A Reversal Theory Approach, edited by John H. Kerr and Michael J. Apter, 13 – 30. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
3. Arico, Adam, Brian Fiala, Robert F. Goldberg, and Shaun Nichols. 2011. “The Folk Psychology of Consciousness.” Mind and Language 26(3): 327 – 52.
4. Bartlett, Frederic C. 1932. “Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bergson, Henri. (1900) 2007. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Cincinnati: Standard Publishing Inc.