Abstract
Abstract
Ancient texts show Democritus as contemptuous and tradition represents him as a laugher. These two aspects of character are easily merged, as we see in Nietzsche, who in this regard is very much the heir of Democritus. The humor in Nietzsche's writings is not extraneous to his philosophy, but coextensive with his thought and an integral expression of his contempt for the targets of his philosophical attacks. Insofar as Nietzsche's humor is neither stylistic, rhetorical, nor intended to emphasize philosophical points antecedent to his process of joking about them, we cannot understand Nietzsche unless we get his jokes.
Reference34 articles.
1. Alfano, Mark. 2018. “The Epistemic Function of Contempt and Laughter in Nietzsche.” In The Moral Psychology of Contempt, edited by Michelle Mason, 57 – 75. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
2. Amir, Lydia. 2022. The Legacy of Nietzsche's Philosophy of Laughter: Bataille, Deleuze, and Rosset. New York: Routledge.
3. Ansell-Pearson, Keith, and Lorenzo Serini. 2022. “Friedrich Nietzsche: Cheerful Thinker and Writer: A Contribution to the Debate on Nietzsche's Cheerfulness.” Nietzsche-Studien 51: 1 – 33.
4. Berry, Jessica N. 2004. “Nietzsche and Democritus: The Origins of Ethical Eudaimonism.” In Nietzsche and Antiquity: His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition, edited by Paul Bishop, 98 – 113. Rochester, NY: Camden House.
5. Boddicker, Charles. 2021. “Humour in Nietzsche's Style,” European Journal of Philosophy 29(2): 447 – 58.