Affiliation:
1. University of Helsinki , Comparative Literature , P. O. Box 59 , Finland
Abstract
Abstract
The surrealists saw their activity as research, which often resulted in art. However, in surrealist scholarship less attention has been paid to how individual surrealists understood research and how their methods were developed. Many of them, such as Paul Nougé and Roger Caillois, launched serious investigations into the irrational with the aim of acknowledging the affective dimensions of (rational) knowledge. Nougé preferred the rigour of science over literature and mapped out ways to import this rigour into poetics. His unique artistic praxis was based on an understanding of language as neither a transparent medium nor an expression of the subjective, ‘unlimited’ imagination favoured by French surrealism. Instead, Nougé’s notions of language and creative invention were informed by mathematics, in particular the thought of the mathematician and philosopher of science Henri Poincaré. For Nougé, scientific research invigorated poetic endeavours as he developed an experimental method that in spirit was closer to mathematics than literary language. The evocation of new phenomena through both science and poetry opened a new view of the human mind: an alternative epistemology of identity, exteriority and the selective evolution of objects.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory
Reference38 articles.
1. Aguirre, Manuel, and Philip Sutton. Margins and Thresholds: An Enquiry into the Concept of Liminality in Text Studies. Madrid: Gateway Press, 2000.
2. Aragon, Louis. “Une vague de rêves.” Œuvres poétiques completes I. Paris: Gallimard, 2007. 79–97.
3. Baetens, Jan and Michael Kasper. Correspondance: The Birth of Belgian Surrealism. New York: Peter Lang, 2015.
4. Baetens, Jan, and Michael Kasper. “Correspondance: Mail Art and Literary Appropriation in the 1920 s.” French Forum 38.1–2 (2013): 109–26.
5. Baillon, André. Un homme si simple. Brussels: Jacques Antoine, 1976.