Affiliation:
1. The Hebrew Language Department , The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Jerusalem , Israel
Abstract
Abstract
This paper sheds light on the alignment of Existential, Possessive and Dative-Experiencer constructions prevalent in Modern Hebrew that involve ambiguity of syntactic relations. Data-driven and employing a strictly typological approach, the study argues that the constructions in question are fundamentally related, and that they do not conform to the typological criteria of ‘subject-oriented’ languages, like most Indo-European languages. It is suggested that an inner relationship holds between the constructions in question. As a non-subject oriented language that does not require entities of referential prominence to be encoded as subjects or topics, Hebrew tends to configure non-volitional events as happening, or coming from outside – existing with reference to the entity experiencing them or who is involved in them as Benefactive or Possessor.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference122 articles.
1. Bally, Charles. 1926. L’expression des idées de sphère personnelle et la solidarité dans les langues indo-européennes. In F. Frankhauser & J. Jud (eds.), Festschrift Louis Gauchaz, 68–78. Aarau: Sauerländer.
2. Barðdal, Jóhanna, Thomas Smitherman, Valgerður Bjarnadóttir, Serena Danesi, Gard B. Jenset & Barbara McGillivray. 2012. Reconstructing constructional semantics: The dative subject construction in Old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian, and Old Lithuanian. Studies in Language 36(3). 511–547. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.3.03bar.
3. Baron, Irène & Michael Herslund. 2001. Semantics of the verb HAVE. In Irène Baron, Michael Herslund & Finn Sørensen (eds.), Dimensions of possession (Typological Studies in Language), vol. 47, 85–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Benveniste, Émile. 1966a. Les niveaux de l’analyse linguistique. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, vol. 1, 119–131. Paris: Gallimard.
5. Benveniste, Émile. 1966b. Structure des relations de personne dans le verbe. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, vol. 1, 225–236. Paris: Gallimard.