Preverbal clitic clusters in the Tanzanian Rift Valley revisited

Author:

Harvey Andrew1ORCID,Gibson Hannah2ORCID,Griscom Richard3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Bayreuth , Bayreuth , Germany

2. University of Essex , Colchester , UK

3. Independent Researcher , Oregon , USA

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines preverbal clitic clusters in the Tanzanian Rift Valley, an area of high linguistic diversity with representatives of the Bantu, Cushitic, and Nilotic families, as well as Sandawe (possibly a distant member of the Khoi-Kwadi family), and the language isolate Hadza. An earlier work (Kießling, Roland, Maarten Mous & Derek Nurse. 2008. The Tanzanian Rift Valley area. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, 186–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) identified preverbal clitic clusters as a widespread feature across many languages of the Rift Valley, and posited the preverbal clitic cluster as a feature characteristic of a ‘Tanzanian Rift Valley Area’. The current paper provides further detail on preverbal clitic clusters across the languages of the region and examines possible routes of development for these structures. From this analysis, the picture that emerges is complex: contact scenarios cannot be restricted to ones in which West Rift Cushitic or its predecessor languages are the only models for the development of a preverbal clitic cluster and, in the case of Sandawe (and perhaps the Datooga varieties), it appears as if the development of a preverbal clitic cluster cannot be linked to contact at all. In terms of what this means for the ‘areality’ of the Tanzanian Rift Valley, this paper forgoes discussions about geographical delineation or arguments for or against a ‘Tanzanian Rift Valley Area’ in favour of highlighting the individual historical events (c.f. Campbell, Lyle. 2017. Why is it so hard to define a linguistic area? In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 19–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) that may have given rise to preverbal clitic clusters in the languages of our sample, as well as encouraging continued investigation into the nature of these histories, both from a linguistic and interdisciplinary perspective.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference82 articles.

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.). 2001. Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Anderson, Gregory. 2011. Auxiliary verb constructions in the languages of Africa. Studies in African Linguistics 40(1–2). 1–409. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v40i1.107282.

3. Bala, Gudo G. (Bonny Sands & Will Grundy eds.). 1998. Hadza stories and songs. Los Angeles: Friends of the Hadzabe.

4. Batibo, Herman. 1985. Le Kesukuma: Langue Bantu de Tanzanie. Paris: Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations.

5. Blurton Jones, Nicholas. 2016. Why do so few Hadza farm? In Brian F. Codding & Karen L. Kramer (eds.), Why forage? Hunters and gatherers in the twenty-first century (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series), 113–136. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3