Organizational Communication and Conflict Management Systems

Author:

Aula Pekka1,Siira Kalle2

Affiliation:

1. Professor, Media and Communication Studies, Department of Social Science, University of Helsinki

2. Researcher, Media and Communication Studies, Department of Social Science, University of Helsinki

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of the present article is to examine the prevailing model of systematic organizational conflict management from an organizational communicative perspective and to suggest directions for improvement. Particularly the model of conflict management system (CMS) is examined at the macro-level from the novel theoretical perspective of social complexity augmented with an interpretive view of organizational communication. Specifically two models – the dual function of communication and the arena model – are utilized to illustrate weaknesses and points of development in traditional CMS thinking. CMS was found to represent a rather limited vision of contemporary conflict management. It is rooted in a mechanistic view of organizational communication, which, we assert, is problematic from the organizational conflict management perspective, both theoretically and practically. The differences between CMS and social complexity approaches are identified, and a fresh framework for strategic conflict management is introduced.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Communication

Reference57 articles.

1. Amason, A.C. (1996) ‘Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, pp. 123-148.

2. Aula, P. (2000) Johtamisen kaaos vai kaaoksen johtaminen? [Chaos of leadership or leadership of chaos?], Juva, Finland: WSOY.

3. Aula, P. (1999) Organisaation kaaos vai kaaoksen organisaatio? Dynaamisen organisaatioviestinnän teoria [Chaos of organization or organization of chaos? Theory of dynamic organizational communication], Helsinki, Finland: Loki-Kirjat.

4. Aula, P. (1996) ‘Chaos and the Double Function of Communication’, Studies of Nonlinear Phenomena in Life Science, Vol. 5, pp. 191-206.

5. Aula, P., and Mantere, S. (2008) Strategic Reputation Management: Toward a Company of Good. New York: Routledge.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3