Affiliation:
1. Information and Analysis Center for Positioning, Navigation and Timing IAC PNT, Central Research Institute for Machine Building (JSC TSNIIMASH) , 4 Pionerskaya St. , Korolev , Moscow Region 141070 , Russian Federation
Abstract
Abstract
The revived interest of many countries and the growing number of ongoing and scheduled missions to the Moon increases the significance of supporting navigation system development. A number of publications are based on multi-Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signal reception from the opposite side of the Earth using high-gain antennas and lunar augmentation constellations. While the accuracy of such systems could be sufficient, the positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) service dependency on circumterestrial navigation sources prevents the use of advanced navigation technologies honed in circumlunar space for further Mars and other celestial body missions, which is one of the major goals of lunar exploration. Moreover, orbit determination and time synchronization (ODTS) method descriptions and estimations are usually skipped in the studies of lunar augmentations. An alternative concept of the Lunar Navigation Satellite System (LNSS) is proposed based on Earth-dependency reduction principal and on-board ODTS. The advantage of the proposed approach is that LNSS-like systems could be adapted for other celestial bodies taking into account aspects such as their shape, dynamics, perturbations, as well as exploration priority regions. The baseline LNSS constellation of three circular orbits with three satellites each has been chosen as the result of multicriterion analysis of orbital stability and geometry. Station keeping requires less than 15 m/s for 10 years without significant changes in navigation performance in the prioritized Polar Regions. The full cycle of LNSS operation from ODTS and signal generation to its reception, processing, and obtaining navigation solutions has been simulated to obtain positioning accuracy for different types of users. Positioning accuracy of space users in approach/departure phases, in near-lunar orbits, as well as static users on a lunar surface is confirmed on a level of a few tens of meters. The same accuracy is achievable by dynamic users on a lunar surface during route stops or also in motion in case of LNSS constellation expansion or deployment of ground-based augmentation beacons in on-site exploration zones.
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reference20 articles.
1. Baird D. 2021 January 5. NASA Explores Upper Limits of Global Navigation Systems for Artemis, nasa.gov.
2. Barton G, Shepperd S, Brand T. 1993. Proposed autonomous lunar navigation system. Astrodynamics. 1717–1736.
3. Bolkunov A, Serdyukov A, Ignatovich E, Kaplev S, Zolkin I. 2012. Some issues on development of the Lunar PNT System to support Moon exploration. Global Space Exploration Conference 2012. Washington, DC. GLEX-2012,02,4,10,x12389.
4. Carpenter J, Folta D, Moreau M, Quinn D. 2004. Libration Point Navigation Concepts Supporting the Vision for Space Exploration. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. Providence, Rhode Island.
5. Chen H, Liu J, Xu Z, Meng Y, Zhang H. 2019. Lunar far side positioning enabled by a CubeSat system deployed in an Earth-Moon halo orbit. Adv Space Res. 64(1):28–41. 10.1016/j.asr.2019.03.031.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献