Author:
Bjerke Paul,Fonn Birgitte Kjos
Abstract
Abstract
The present article analyses press coverage of the dramatic finance crisis and the ensuing European debt crisis in Europe, in three decisive periods. The authors conduct quantitative and qualitative content analyses of two major mainstream Norwegian newspapers, Aftenposten and Dagbladet, employing concepts and methods from framing theory, to analyse coverage in the framework of two contesting schools in economics.
The study finds traces of discussions of finance brokers’ ethics and some discussions of governmental regulations that made the 2008 crisis possible, but few indications of a basic discussion of the system as such. The authors conclude that the crisis was framed more as a superficial, short-term problem (as per a mainstream, neoliberal theory of economics) than as a deeper and long-term system problem (as a more critical ‘political economics’ theory would have held).
Reference10 articles.
1. Power problem;Starkman;Columbia Journalism Review,2009
2. The Constructionist Approach to Framing : Bringing the Culture Back;Van Gorp;Journal of Communication,2007
3. Making Sense of Different Types of Crisis of Press;Nord;Harvard International Journal Politics,2003
4. and van Power to the Frame : Bringing Sociology back to Frame Analysis;Vliegenthart;European Journal of Communication,2011
5. Framing analysis An approach to news discourse;Pan;Political Communication,1993
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献