Affiliation:
1. Faculteit der Filosofie, Theologie en Religiewetenschappen , Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen , Postbus 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen , The Netherlands
2. Higher School of Economics , Moscow , Russia
Abstract
Abstract
The main tenet of this paper is that human communication is first and foremost a matter of negotiating commitments, rather than one of conveying intentions, beliefs, and other mental states. Every speech act causes the speaker to become committed to the hearer to act on a propositional content. Hence, commitments are relations between speakers, hearers, and propositions. Their purpose is to enable speakers and hearers to coordinate their actions: communication is coordinated action for action coordination. To illustrate the potential of the approach, commitment-based analyses are offered for a representative sample of speech act types, conversational implicatures, as well as for common ground.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference56 articles.
1. Anscombe, G. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Apperly, I. A. 2011. Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of “theory of mind”. Hove: Psychology Press.
3. Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bach, K. & R. M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Beyssade, C. & J.-M. Marandin. 2009. Commitment: Une attitude dialogique. Langue Française 162. 89–107.
Cited by
90 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献