Affiliation:
1. Department of Linguistics , University of California , Santa Barbara , CA , USA
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, I examine the Literary Chinese reflexive zì, which exhibits a crosslinguistically uncommon pattern: it performs both anaphoric and emphatic uses in adverbial position. I show that it has several uses: signalling coreference between the subject and the object, the object’s possessor or the topic or focus of a complement clause, emphasising that the subject’s identity, and indicating that the event affected the subject itself or had no external cause. I argue against categorically dividing these uses into anaphoric and emphatic uses. I propose four properties to unify the various uses: the referent of zì is centrally relevant to the event denoted by the predicate, coreferential with the subject, unexpected in its role in the event, and often contrasts with an alternative referent that may play same role. I compare my account to properties of reflexives in other languages, and argue that zì only partially supports Levinson’s (Levinson, Stephen C. 1991. Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27(1). 107–161) theory of the development of anaphoric reflexives from emphatics.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference60 articles.
1. Aissen, Judith. 1987. Tzotzil clause structure. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel.
2. Aldridge, Edith. 2008. Phase theory and Old Chinese reflexives. Paper presented at the 5th Theoretical East Asian Languages Workshop. University of Potsdam.
3. Aldridge, Edith. 2009. Local and long distance reflexives in Archaic Chinese. In Simon Fraser University working papers in linguistics, vol. 2: Proceedings of the 2nd meeting of the international conference on East Asian linguistics, vol. 2.
4. Ariel, Mira. 2004. Accessibility marking: Discourse functions, discourse profiles, and processing cues. Discourse Processes 37(2). 91–116. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315046105-2.
5. Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.