Beyond anaphoric and emphatic: diversity and unity in the functions of literary Chinese reflexive

Author:

Lai Ryan Ka Yau1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Linguistics , University of California , Santa Barbara , CA , USA

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I examine the Literary Chinese reflexive , which exhibits a crosslinguistically uncommon pattern: it performs both anaphoric and emphatic uses in adverbial position. I show that it has several uses: signalling coreference between the subject and the object, the object’s possessor or the topic or focus of a complement clause, emphasising that the subject’s identity, and indicating that the event affected the subject itself or had no external cause. I argue against categorically dividing these uses into anaphoric and emphatic uses. I propose four properties to unify the various uses: the referent of is centrally relevant to the event denoted by the predicate, coreferential with the subject, unexpected in its role in the event, and often contrasts with an alternative referent that may play same role. I compare my account to properties of reflexives in other languages, and argue that only partially supports Levinson’s (Levinson, Stephen C. 1991. Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27(1). 107–161) theory of the development of anaphoric reflexives from emphatics.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference60 articles.

1. Aissen, Judith. 1987. Tzotzil clause structure. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel.

2. Aldridge, Edith. 2008. Phase theory and Old Chinese reflexives. Paper presented at the 5th Theoretical East Asian Languages Workshop. University of Potsdam.

3. Aldridge, Edith. 2009. Local and long distance reflexives in Archaic Chinese. In Simon Fraser University working papers in linguistics, vol. 2: Proceedings of the 2nd meeting of the international conference on East Asian linguistics, vol. 2.

4. Ariel, Mira. 2004. Accessibility marking: Discourse functions, discourse profiles, and processing cues. Discourse Processes 37(2). 91–116. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315046105-2.

5. Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3