Affiliation:
1. Department of German Studies , University of Potsdam , Potsdam , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
The Turkic varieties of the Balkans use two main diametrically opposed subordination strategies: (i) the Turkic model, where typical subordinate clauses are prepositive, nonfinite, contain clause-final subordinators, etc. and (ii) the Indo-European model, where typical subordinate clauses are postpositive, finite, contain clause-initial subordinators, etc. The paper observes that Balkan Turkic additionally uses several kinds of subordinate clause that allow for problematic mixtures of these two models (‘X-clauses’). Spread over a spectrum between the Turkic and Indo-European extremes, X-clauses can, for instance, be prepositive but contain clause-initial subordinators. The paper, then, hypothesizes that X-clauses emerge due to uncertainties in the structural parameters of the Balkan Turkic subordination system. Such uncertainties are typical of complex systems undergoing change and arise in the present case due to the shift in Balkan Turkic away from Turkic towards Indo-European subordination.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference88 articles.
1. Artun, Erman. 2013. Geçmişten günümüze kültürel değişim ve gelişim sürecinde Balkanlarda Türkçe [Turkish in the Balkans in its historical process of cultural change and development]. In Adem Balaban & Bünyamin Çağlayan (eds.), Uluslararası dil ve edebiyat çalışmaları konferansı “Balkanlarda Türkçe” bildiri kitabı [Proceedings of the international conference on Turkish in the Balkans], vol. 1, x–xx. Tirana: Universiteti “Hëna e Plotë” (BEDËR) Press.
2. Auwera, Johan van der. 2011. Standard Average European. In Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, vol. 1, 291–306. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
3. Bayer, Josef. 2001. Two grammars in one: Sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages. In Rajendra Singh (ed.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics, 11–36. New Delhi: Sage.
4. Boev, Emil. 1968. Bulgaristan Türk diyalektolojisiyle ilgili çalışmalar [Works on Turkish dialectology in Bulgaria]. In 11. Türk Dil Kurultayında okunan bilimsel bildiriler 1966 [Proceedings of the 11th Turkish Language Congress 1966], 171–178. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
5. Bolver, Mert. 2014. Üsküp’te yaşayan Türklerin dil durumu [The linguistic situation of the Turks in Skopje]. Samsun: Ondokuz Mayıs University MA thesis.