Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Arts, Research Group Quantitative Lexicology and Variational Linguistics, KU Leuven , Brussel , Belgium
2. Department of Linguistics , Universiteit Antwerpen , Antwerpen , Belgium
3. Department of Culture Studies , Tilburg University , Tilburg , The Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
This paper targets the division of labor between borrowed English forms and heritage alternatives in Belgian-Dutch youth language. Through lexical semantic analysis of a youth-language corpus containing over 450,000 private instant messages, the choice for English or Dutch person-reference nouns (e.g. Eng. girlfriend, loser, sister; Du. vriendin, sukkel, zus) is studied at three levels of semasiological granularity. First, at the level of the semantic field as a whole, Dutch appears to have the strongest foothold, accounting for over 75 % of the types and over 85 % of the tokens referencing people. Second, coarse-grained semantic-feature annotation reveals that Dutch retains its dominant position in all identified semantic subcategories of person-reference nouns although some hubs of English are also attested. Third, an in-depth analysis of the selection between the near-synonyms sis, sister, zus, zusje and zuster in the corpus indicates socio-pragmatic differentiation between the English and Dutch terms, English being used more for (affective) address and for friends, Dutch being reserved for reference and for proper kin. Overall, our study indicates the potential of a three-tiered onomasiological approach: the results of the three case studies show both similarities, in the systematically stronger foothold of Dutch at all levels of analysis, and differences, in the semantic specialization for English progressively uncovered from the first to the third sub-study.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference61 articles.
1. Aleksandrova, Angelina. 2014. Pourquoi les relations lexicales entre les noms d’humains sont-elles (parfois) compliquées?. Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF 2014, SHS Web of Conferences 8. 2963–2976. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20140801372.
2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2004. Non-native English and sub-cultural identities in media discourse. In Helge Sandøy, Endre Brunstad, Jon Erik Hagen, Jon Erik & Karl Tenfjord (eds.), Den fleirspråklege utfordinga/The multilingual challenge, 83–98. Oslo: Novus.
3. Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2011. Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In Tore Kristiansen & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe, 145–161. Oslo: Novus.
4. Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2012. English ‘on top’: Discourse functions of English resources in the German mediascape. Sociolinguistic Studies 6(2). 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v6i2.209.
5. Backus, Ad. 2001. The role of semantic specificity in insertional codeswitching: Evidence from Dutch-Turkish. In Rodolfo Jacobson (ed.), Codeswitching worldwide, vol. 2, 125–154. Berlin: De Gruyter.