Suǒyǐ ‘so’, they are different: an integrated subjectivity account of Mandarin RESULT connectives in conversation, microblog and newspaper discourse

Author:

Xiao Hongling1ORCID,Li Fang2,Sanders Ted J. M.3,Spooren Wilbert P. M. S.4

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Xiamen University , South Siming Rd. 422 , Xiamen , 361005 , China

2. School of English Language, Literature, and Culture, Beijing International Studies University , Beijing , China

3. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Universiteit Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands

4. Centre for Language Studies, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen , Nijmegen , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we analyze the meaning and use of Mandarin causal connectives kějiàn ‘therefore/it can be seen that’, suǒyǐ ‘so’, yīncǐ ‘for this reason’, and yúshì ‘thereupon/as a result’ in terms of causality and subjectivity. We adopt an integrated approach to subjectivity and analyze the subjectivity profile of a causal construction in terms of three features: the propositional attitude of the consequent, the identity of the subject of consciousness (SoC), and the linguistic realization of the SoC. The investigation is based on natural discourse produced in fundamentally distinctive channels, namely, spontaneous conversation, microblogging, and formal writing. Compared to previous studies, the empirical foundation is therefore enlarged and more varied. The results show that these connectives differ systematically from each other with regard to the above three features, and that the differences remain robust across the three discourse types. The relative importance of each feature in characterizing the connectives is also determined. The propositional attitude appears to be the most important subjectivity feature, followed by the linguistic realization of the SoC and the identity of the SoC.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference60 articles.

1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4817295.

2. BCC: Beijing Language and Culture University Corpus Center (BLCU BCC). http://bcc.blcu.edu.cn/.

3. Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC), University of Pennsylvania. https://www.ldc.upenn.edu/.

4. Media Language Corpus (MLC). 2005. Monitoring and Research Center of National Broadcast Media Language Resources, Communication University of China. http://ling.cuc.edu.cn/RawPub/.

5. Anderson, Marta. 2016. The Architecture of RESULT relations: Corpus and experimental approaches to RESULT coherence relations in English. Stockholm: Stockholm University dissertation.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3