Affiliation:
1. Languages and Linguistics , The Open University Milton Keynes , UK
Abstract
Abstract
Complementation strategies in both ancient and modern Semitic languages include the use of a series of cognate complementizers typically sharing a k-element: e.g., Tigrinya käm, Modern Hebrew ki, Akkadian kī(ma) or Ge’ez kama. The sources and the developments that led to the complementizer use of these multifunctional k-subordinators are not sufficiently clear, and diverse interpretations have been proposed. The present article analyses the oldest written record of k-complement markers in Semitic, focusing on Old Akkadian, Old Babylonian and Old Assyrian. The analysis of the type and distribution of complement constructions suggest a different explanation for their development based on the grammaticalization of similative manner expressions, a process attested in Afro-Asiatic and other languages. The article also highlights the presence and potential role of nominal complementation among the earliest recorded forms of complementation in Akkadian. The data presented here provide insights into the origin of k-complementizers in Semitic languages with less ancient written evidence, from Ancient Hebrew to Ethiosemitic.
Reference67 articles.
1. Arbøll, Troels P. & Aage Westenholz. 2019. Notes on a recently published Old Akkadian letter. Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 2019(4). 157–158.
2. Black, Jeremy A., Andrew R. George & Nicholas Postgate. 2000. A concise dictionary of Akkadian. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
3. Bordreuil, Pierre & Dennis Pardee. 2009. A manual of Ugaritic. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
4. Boye, Kasper. 2010. Reference and clausal perception-verb complements. Linguistics 48(2). 391–430. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.013.
5. Brockelmann, Carl. 1908. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen, Band I. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献