Affiliation:
1. 6187 University of Oklahoma , Norman , OK , USA
Abstract
Abstract
This study provides new data on the use of agent focus (AF) versus transitive constructions in Kaqchikel. This work follows up on a study done by Heaton et al. (Heaton, Raina, Kamil Deen & William O’Grady. 2016. An investigation of relativization in Kaqchikel Maya. Lingua 170. 35–46) which found that while questioning the subject of a transitive verb regularly requires the use of AF or an antipassive, relativizing the subject of a transitive verb does not. Present findings show that AF is only common in half of the six primary syntactic contexts that allow it, which is unexpected under the assumption that AF is a last resort strategy. I suggest that the differences between these syntactic contexts in Kaqchikel are related to the presence of a preverbal lexical NP element which is available to be interpreted as the agent. Comparative descriptive evidence is also compiled demonstrating that transitive verbs are possible in syntactic contexts that traditionally have been considered to require AF across Eastern Mayan languages.
Reference92 articles.
1. Aissen, Judith. 1992. Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 68(1). 43–80. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0017.
2. Aissen, Judith. 1999. Agent focus and inverse in Tzotzil. Language 75(3). 451–485. https://doi.org/10.2307/417057.
3. Aissen, Judith. 2011. On the syntax of agent focus in K’iche’. In Kirill Shklovsky, Pedro Mateo Pedro & Jessica Coon (eds.), Proceedings of formal approaches to Mayan linguistics (FAMLi), 1–16. (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 63). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Aissen, Judith. 2017a. Correlates of ergativity in Mayan. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 737–758. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Aissen, Judith. 2017b. Information structure in Mayan. In Judith Aissen, Nora England & Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds.), The Mayan languages, 293–324. New York: Routledge.