Affiliation:
1. Pembroke College, University of Cambridge , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire , UK
2. Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics , University of Cambridge , Cambridge , Cambridgeshire , UK
Abstract
Abstract
Talmy’s motion event typology (Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Towards a cognitive semantics: Conceptual structuring systems, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press) has served as an influential framework for exploring event representation across languages. While confirming its basic premises, many studies argued that the typology cannot fully capture the vast intra- and inter-typological variations. Consequently, proposals have been made to expand the typology and/or reconceptualize it as a typology of constructional strategies for encoding events. This article furthers this line of inquiry by examining caused-motion expressions by adult speakers of an understudied Turkic language, Modern Uyghur. Systematic analyses of lexicalization patterns, that is, which components are typically selected for expression, how frequently they are selected, and how they are packaged in syntactic constructions, show that Uyghur is a prototypical verb-framed language. It differs most strikingly from English (considered satellite-framed) in terms of lexicalization patterns. Detailed comparisons with French and Turkish (putatively verb-framed) reveal intra-typological variations in that Uyghur speakers systematically used verb-framed constructions while French and Turkish speakers exhibit much flexibility and a general preference for satellite-framed constructions. Overall, our data lend support to Talmy’s typology conceived as a strategy-based typological framework.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference82 articles.
1. Aksu-Koç, Ayhan. 1994. Development of linguistic forms: Turkish. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan Issac Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 329–392. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Allen, Shanley, Asli Özyurëk, Sotaro Kita, Amanda Brown, Reyhan Furman, Tomoko Ishizuka & Mihoko Fujii. 2007. Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese and Turkish. Cognition 102(1). 16–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006.
3. Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 15, 1–14.
4. Ameka, Felix K. & James Essegbey. 2013. Serializing language: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics 2(1). 19–38.
5. Barr, Dale J. 2013. Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects model. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献