Typology of partitives

Author:

Seržant Ilja A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Slavonic Studies , Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel , Leibnizstraße 10, D-24098 Kiel , Germany

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the coding patterns of partitives and their functional extensions, based on a convenience sample of 138 languages from 46 families from all macroareas. Partitives are defined as constructions that may express the proportional relation of a subset to a superset (the true-partitive relation). First, it is demonstrated that, crosslinguistically, partitive constructions vary as to their syntactic properties and morphological marking. Syntactically, there is a cline from loose – possibly less grammaticalized – structures to partitives with rigid head-dependent relations and, finally, to morphologically integrated one-word partitives. Furthermore, partitives may be encoded NP-internally (mostly via an adposition) or pronominally. Morphologically, partitives primarily involve markers syncretic with separative, locative or possessive meanings. Finally, a number of languages employ no partitive marker at all. Secondly, these different strategies are not evenly distributed in the globe, with, for example, Eurasia being biased for the separative strategy. Thirdly, on the functional side, partitives may have functions in the following domains in addition to the true-partitive relation: plain quantification (pseudo-partitives), hypothetical events, predicate negation and aspectuality. I claim that the ability to encode plain quantification is the prerequisite for the other domains. Finally, it is argued that there is a universal preference towards syncretism of two semantically distinct concepts: the proportional, true-partitive relation (some of the books) and plain quantification (some books).

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference164 articles.

1. Abraham, P. T. 1985. Apatani grammar (Central Institute of Indian Languages: Grammar Series 12). Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.

2. Aiton, Grant. 2016. Grammatical relations and information structure in Eibela: A typological perspective. Douglas: James Cook University dissertation.

3. Ambrazas, V., K. Garšva, A. Girdenis, E. Jakaitienė, P. Kniūkšta, S. Krinickaitė, V. Labutis & A. Laigonaitė. 2006. Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos gramatika. A grammar of modern Lithuanian. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.

4. Anderson, Gregory D. & David K. Harrison. 1999. Tyvan. (Languages of the World/Materials 257). Munich: Lincom.

5. Arkadiev, Peter & Kirill Kozhanov. forthcoming. Object partitive of negation: An areal perspective. In Björn Wiemer & Arkadiev Peter (eds.), Convergence and divergence in the eastern Circum-Baltic Area (A triangulation approach). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3