Affiliation:
1. Instytut Anglistyki i Amerykanistyki , Uniwersytet Gdánski , Gdańsk , Poland
Abstract
AbstractModal verbs are well-known to license ellipsis of their complements under certain conditions. In the literature on Spanish, such sequences, which I refer to as Modal Ellipsis (ME), have been traditionally argued to involve a null pronoun. These analyses therefore treat ME simply as an instance of Null Complement Anaphora (NCA). In this article, I scrutinize the data adduced in the literature on Spanish and defend that (i) ME in this language is different from NCA, and (ii) ME must involve PF-deletion of a TP node. Even though these claims are not new, I provide novel data in an attempt to clarify some of the controversial facts and claims that exist in the Spanish literature. In doing so, I strengthen the recent view of ME as a PF-deletion phenomenon.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference50 articles.
1. Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2008. Dutch modal complement ellipsis. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 7, 7–33. Paris: CSSP.
2. Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2010. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
3. Arregui, Ana, Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier & Keir Moulton. 2006. Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 55. 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.005.
4. Authier, Marc. 2011. A movement analysis of French modal ellipsis. Probus 23. 175–216. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2011.005.
5. Bok-Bennema, Reineke. 2006. Clitic climbing. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. V, 229–343. Oxford: Blackwell.