The Mediated Engagement of Switzerland with BRI: A Transnational Comparative Framing Analysis

Author:

Zhang Zhan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Università della Svizzera italiana , Via G.Buffi 13 , 6900 , Lugano , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract This paper offers a transnational comparative framing analysis of leading legacy news media in Switzerland (Neue Zürcher Zeitung, abbreviated to NZZ, in German) and China (China Daily in English) in their coverage of Swiss engagement with the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2017 and 2019. The results implied a clear dominance of both newspapers’ economic and political actors and related frames. By introducing a geopolitical frame into the generic frame categories and adding an economy-driven frame into domestic frame categories based on the current framing pool from Transcultural Comparative Framing Model (TCFM), the study discussed how the two newspapers shared the same focus by frequency but differed from each other in the contextual discourse through argumentation. China Daily preferred to report from a general and positive overview, focusing on bilateral relations between China and Switzerland. In contrast, NZZ intended to cover more about specific Swiss industries and international actors such as the European Union and the United States, presenting a hybrid perspective towards BRI. The study found a clear presence of ideology-driven and political-position-driven frames on both newspapers—NZZ in particular. Given the importance of cultural congruence in framing studies, the study calls for an inclusion of more cultural notions and a general transcultural frame for reporting and researching emerging transnational topics through TCFM. Only when a discursive space is created with respect to different cultural patterns, might resonation in communicative encounters and conceptualization repertoires become possible.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference74 articles.

1. Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.

2. Cauwenberge, A. V., Gelders, D., & Joris, W. (2009). Covering the European Union from an intergovernmental towards a supranational perspective? Javnost: The Public, 16(4), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2009.11009013.

3. Chang, T. K. (1993). The press and China policy: The illusion of Sino-American relations, 1950–1984. Ablex Publishing Corp.

4. Chen, W. (2019, January 23). China, Switzerland vow to expand ties. China Daily. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2019-01/23/content_37430304.htm.

5. China Daily. (2019, April 22). Belt and Road Initiative shot in the arm for world economy. China Daily. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2019-04/22/content_37460785.htm.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3