Towards EU 2020: An Outlook of SECA Regulations Implementation in the BSR

Author:

Olaniyi Eunice Omolola1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Business Administration , Tallinn University of Technology , Akadeemia tee 3, Tallinn 12618 , Estonia

Abstract

Abstract The clean shipping concept emerged in a bid to make maritime transportation green and environmentally friendly. This mandate is being accomplished through improved conducts, actions and technology in the maritime industry. One of such measures was the creation of the Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECA) in 2005 and 2012 to reduce the rate of sulphur emissions from shipping. Sustainable growth—an EU 2020 priority—is strategically linked to the SECA regulation in that it promotes resource efficiency, greener environment and a competitive economy. Thus, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and, as adopted by the European Parliament (EP), SECA regulation stipulated that from 2015 all ships in SECA are under the obligation to use low sulphur marine fuel that must not exceed 0.1% (IMO, 2011). This regulation has incited rigorous arguments on the economic disadvantage it would subject affected maritime stakeholders who are made to comply with stringent regulation their counterparts in non-SECA are not subjected to. Two years of 0.1% sulphur regulations have witnessed many changes in the maritime industry and most of the first responses were realised with vessels that ply along the Baltic Sea. This work presents an account of European maritime industry’s approaches towards SECA regulations and the stakeholders’ thoughts on the economic impact of SECA. This contribution brings a clearer picture to the status quo as well as highlighting a needed future focus.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History

Reference68 articles.

1. Abrahamson, E. (1991), ‘Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations,’ Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 586–612. https://doi.org/10.2307/25891910.2307/258919

2. Aczel, A.D. & Sounderpandian, J. (2002), Complete Business Statistics, vol. 1, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

3. AirClim (2011), Air Pollution from Ships, Air Pollution & Climate Secretariat, Seas at Risk, Bellona Foundation, North Sea Foundation, Transport & Environment & European Environmental Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.transportenvironment.org/publications/air-pollution-ships-0 [accessed 9 Sep 2016]

4. Alcamo, J.; Amann, M.; Hettelingh, J. P.; Holmberg, M.; Hordijk, L.; Kämäri, J.; Kauppi, L.; Kauppi, P.; Kornai, G. & Mäkelä, A. (1987), ‘Acidification in Europe: a simulation model for evaluating control strategies,’ Ambio, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 232–245.

5. Atari, S. & Prause, G. (2017, forthcoming), ‘Risk assessment of emission abatement technologies for clean shipping,’ in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference “Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication” (RelSTat2017 Conference), Riga.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3