Parliamentary Questions: Expressions of Opposition(s) within the European Parliament?

Author:

Kaniok Petr1,Komínková Magda1

Affiliation:

1. Department of International Relations and European Studies, Faculty of Social Science , Masaryk University , Jostova 10, Brno 602 00 , Czech Republic

Abstract

Abstract Parliamentary questions are a direct form of parliamentary scrutiny of other EU institutions and bodies, traditionally being an important tool for the opposition. This study examines how parliamentary questions are used in the European Parliament. We ascertain whether political groups representing opposition differ in their use of parliamentary questions from those who are represented in the European Commission. The article presents two main findings. First, such a difference does exist in all types of questions at the aggregated level. Groups not represented in the European Commission pose more questions than those who are represented. Secondly, it appears that the type of parliamentary question determines the groups’ behaviour. The article thus contributes to our understanding of how opposition functions in the European Parliament.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History

Reference33 articles.

1. Akbaba, S. (2014), ‘A critical assessment of a Eurosceptic party group on European integration: A case study of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–118. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-000610.2478/bjes-2014-0006

2. Brack, N. (2012), ‘Eurosceptics in the European Parliament: exit or voice?’ Journal of European Integration, vol. 34, pp. 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.64108710.1080/07036337.2012.641087

3. Brack, N. (2015), ‘The roles of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament and their implications for the EU,’ International Political Science Review, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251211557159010.1177/0192512115571590

4. Bressanelli, E. (2012), ‘National parties and group membership in the European Parliament: ideology or pragmatism?’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.64679010.1080/13501763.2011.646790

5. Bressanelli, E. (2013), ‘Competitive and coherent? Profiling the Europarties in the 2009 European Parliament elections,’ Journal of European Integration, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.71182410.1080/07036337.2012.711824

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3