Keeping Safe Distance: Chapters from Randomised (Non)Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights before Polish Constitutional Tribunal

Author:

Kustra-Rogatka Aleksandra1,Hamuľák Ondrej2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Law and Administration , Nicolaus Copernicus University , ul. Władysława Bojarskiego 3, Toruń 87-100 , Poland

2. Faculty of Law , Palacký University Olomouc , Tr. 17 Listopadu 8, Olomouc 771 11 , Czech Republic

Abstract

Abstract The question of the application and impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (‘Charter’) in quotidian practice of human rights protection and review is a strategic one. Given the predominantly decentralised effects of EU law and with the due account to the wide interpretation of the scope of the Charter’s application (Art. 51(1)) presented by the CJEU (C-617/10 Fransson), the national dimension of the application of the Charter forms the crucial issue for the functioning of the EU system of fundamental rights protection. The Charter itself has a big potential to influence the content, nature and mechanisms of the fundamental rights protection at the national level. The present paper focuses on this phenomena in connection to the case-law, opinions and workload of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal (‘TK’). It analyses the approach of TK towards the Charter in abstract manner as well as the (non)appearance of the Charter in the reasoning of the court in concrete cases. The article reports on the main cases and analyses the reasons of the aloof approach of the TK towards the EU human rights catalogue.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History

Reference83 articles.

1. Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson [2013], CJEU C-617/10, ECLI:EU:C:2013:105, 26.2.2013.

2. Albi, A. & Bardutzky, S., eds. (2019), National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, The Rule of Law: National Reports, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-273-610.1007/978-94-6265-273-6

3. Andras, J. (2017), ‘Application of the EU Charter by national courts in purely domestic cases,’ in A. Jakab & D. Kochenov (eds.) The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 252–264.

4. Arnull, A. (2014), ‘Protocol (No 30) on the Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and the United Kingdom,’ in S. Peers, T. Harvey, J. Kenner & A. Ward (eds.) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A Commentary, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 1596–1597. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845259055_163810.5771/9783845259055_1638

5. Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas [2018], CJEU C-64/16, ECLI: EU:C:2018:117, 27.2.2018, para 34.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3