Safety-Critical Personality Aspects in Human-Machine Teams of Aviation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Safety-Critical Personality Aspects in Human-Machine Teams of Aviation

Published:2016-12-01 Issue:3 Volume:15 Page:283-295
ISSN:2196-6826
Container-title:i-com
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Eschen Solveig C. S.¹^ORCID,Keye-Ehing Doris²,Gayraud Katja²

Affiliation:

1. German Aerospace Center (DLR) – Aviation and Space Psychology, Sportallee 54a, 22335 Hamburg, Germany

2. German Aerospace Center (DLR) – Aviation and Space Psychology, Hamburg, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Working safely and successfully in highly automated human-machine interfaces of future aviation is not only a matter of performance, but also of personality. This study examines which personality aspects correlate with safety-critical performance in human-machine teams. The research tools HTQ (Hybrid Team Questionnaire) and HINT (Hybrid Interaction Scenario) were combined for a comprehensive exploratory study. The HTQ includes personality scales measuring broad factors of personality (Big Five) as well as more specific scales and was added with objective personality assessments to measure risk taking. The simulation tool HINT simulates relevant processes in future human-machine team interaction in aviation. In a study with 156 applicants for aviation careers, safety-critical relations of some facets of general personality as well as risk taking were found. Especially personality aspects concerning disinhibiting, spontaneous behaviour and sensation seeking show correlations with poorer performance in the HINT simulation.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Communication,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Information Systems,Social Psychology

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/icom-2016-0032/pdf

Reference38 articles.

1. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and Performance at the beginning of the New Millennium: What do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 9–30.

2. BEA. (2016). Final Report on the Safety Investigation of Airbus A320-211, D-AIPX BEA. Retrieved from: https://www.bea.aero/uploads/tx_elydbrapports/BEA2015-0125.en-LR.pdf

3. Beier, G. (2004). Kontrollüberzeugung im Umgang mit Technik: Ein Persönlichkeitsmerkmal mit Relevanz für die Gestaltung technischer Systeme [Locus of Control in a Technological Context]. Dissertation Premium. Berlin: dissertation.de.

4. Bradshaw, J. M., Feltovich, P., & Johnson, M. (2011). Human-agent interaction. In G. A. Boy (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Machine Interaction (pp. 283–302) Ashgate.

5. Bruder, C., Eißfeldt, H., Maschke, P., & Hasse, C. Differences in Monitoring between Experts and Novices. Prodeedings of the HFES 57th Annual Meeting, September 30 – October 4, 2013, San Diego.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Big Five Factors of Personality, Impulsivity and Response Inhibition in Aviation Employees;2022-11-01