Affiliation:
1. imec-SMIT Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium
2. imec-SMIT Vrije Universiteit Brussel/University of the Western Cape Brussel Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
Media use can empower people, provided that this is accompanied by a deeper understanding of the actors, processes and structures in the media sector – including media policy. It is, however, to be expected that media users’ literacy of media policy is rather limited. This is problematic as the absence of such understanding makes it impossible for citizens to hold the politicians they elected accountable for the media policy they develop. This article explores what media users know about media policy, what they expect to know, and whether they care. We adopted a case-study approach, researching this question for the region of Flanders based on a combination of quantitative (representative survey) and qualitative (49 in-depth interviews) data. While the article focuses on the case of Flanders, its theoretical basis as well as conclusion section are relevant beyond that specific context.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication
Reference53 articles.
1. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytical tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.
2. Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media literacy: A report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Washington, DC: Communications and Society Program, the Aspen Institute.
3. Austin, H. W. (2002). Sample size: How much is enough? In D. De Vaus (Ed.), Social surveys, volume 4 (pp. 51–57). London: Sage Publications.
4. Baldi, P., & Hasebrink, U. (Eds.) (2006). Broadcasters and citizens in Europe. Trends in media accountability and viewer participation. Bristol: Intellect.
5. Bardoel, J., & d’Haenens, L. (2004). Media meet the citizen: Beyond market mechanisms and government regulations. European Journal of Communication, 19(2), 165–194.