Affiliation:
1. Institute for Media Studies Leuven Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
This study examines how Meta as a company of various social media platforms communicates the disinformation crisis. Social media platforms are seen as a breeding ground for disinformation, and companies like Meta risk not only suffering reputational damage but also being further regulated by national and international legislation. We consider in this paper the news stories that Meta posted on the topic of disinformation on its own website between 2016 and 2022 as crisis communication, and build on insights from this domain that discuss some key response strategies. In this way, we conclude that Meta’s communication can be seen as crisis communication, and that it uses strategies such as addressing different stakeholders, sticking to key messages when discussing the interventions, and holding itself responsible for finding a solution rather than for the problem of disinformation itself. These insights contribute to understanding how Meta seeks to validate its legitimacy during this ongoing crisis, and how it engages in self-regulation.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication
Reference54 articles.
1. Al-Rawi, A. (2019). Gatekeeping fake news discourses on mainstream media versus social media. Social Science Computer Review, 37(6), 687–704.
2. Basch, C. H., Meleo-Erwin, Z., Fera, J., Jaime, C., & Basch, C. E. (2021). A global pandemic in the time of viral memes: COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation on TikTok. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 17(8), 2373–2377.
3. Benoit, W. L. (2005). Image restoration theory. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public relations: Volume I (pp. 407–410). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Benoit, W. L. (2014). Image repair theory in the context of strategic communication. In The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 327–335). Routledge.
5. Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10.