The sternal brace: a novel osteopathic diagnostic screening tool to rule out cardiac chest pain in the emergency department
Author:
Gianneschi Garrett1ORCID, Patel Sarthak2, Hinfey Patrick3
Affiliation:
1. Department of Neurology , Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School , Newark , NJ , USA 2. Department of Internal Medicine , Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School , Newark , NJ , USA 3. Department of Emergency Medicine , Robert Wood Johnson-Barnabas Health System at Newark Beth Israel Medical Center , Newark , NJ , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Context
Chest pain is one of the most common emergency medicine complaints in the United States, yet no reliable physical examination finding exists to help differentiate cardiac chest pain (CCP) from noncardiac chest pain (non-CCP).
Objectives
This is a diagnostic accuracy study of the sternal brace, a novel physical examination maneuver to rule out cardiac-related chest pain from non-CCP.
Methods
We performed this double-blind prospective diagnostic accuracy pilot study on 34 adults in the Newark Beth Israel emergency department with a chief complaint of chest pain. We utilized the Numerical Rating Scale 0–10 (NRS) to quantify chest pain severity before and after the maneuver. Eligible for inclusion were adults over 18 years old who were able to provide written informed consent. We performed the sternal brace on all consenting adults meeting these criteria, and the researchers were blinded between test results and final diagnosis. Cardiac ischemia in the US with a disease prevalence of 0.029 was utilized.
Results
A total of 34 patients were included, of whom 11 had a final diagnosis of cardiac-related chest pain. The cutoff value was a decrease in pain severity of 2 or greater between pretest and posttest. Sensitivity was 81.8 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 48.2–97.7 %); specificity 34.8 % (95 % CI, 16.4–57.3 %), the positive predictive value was 3.6 % (95 % CI, 0.1–20.3 %), and the negative predictive value was 98.4 % (95 % CI, 66.8–100.0 %).
Conclusions
The sternal brace is a good screening test because if a person with chest pain has an NRS that decreases by 2 or more with the maneuver, then there is a 98.5 % chance that the chest pain is noncardiac, given the prevalence of cardia ischemia. In addition, if the disease is present, then it is 81.8 % likely that their NRS will not decrease by more than 2.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Complementary and alternative medicine,Complementary and Manual Therapy
Reference10 articles.
1. Blatchford, O, Capewell, S, Murray, S, Blatchford, M. Emergency medical admissions in glasgow: general practices vary despite adjustment for age, sex, and deprivation. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:551–4. 2. Knockaert, DC, Buntinx, F, Stoens, N, Bruyninckx, R, Delooz, H. Chest pain in the emergency department: the broad spectrum of causes. Eur J Emerg Med 2002;9:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00063110-200203000-00007. 3. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: emergency department summary: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2009_ed_web_tables.pdf [Accessed 6 Sept 2023]. 4. Newby, DE, Fox, KA, Flint, LL, Boon, NA. A ‘same day’ direct-access chest pain clinic: improved management and reduced hospitalization. QJM 1998;91:333–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/91.5.333. 5. Bickley, LS, Szilagyi, PG. Bates’ guide to physical examination and history taking, 11th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
|
|