Comparing cranial suture interdigitation in humans and non-human primates: unearthing links to osteopathic cranial concept
Author:
Blumer Janice1, Arney Irisa1, Hardin Anna1, Nichols Morgan1, Arsenault Luke1, Petrucci John1
Affiliation:
1. Western University of Health Sciences, COMP Northwest , Lebanon , OR , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Context
Since William Garner Sutherland’s inception of osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine (OCMM), osteopathic physicians have practiced with the knowledge that cranial sutures exhibit motion. We hypothesize that the complexity of suture interdigitation in humans may provide clues to elucidate the concept of OCMM.
Objectives
We compared the interdigitation of sagittal, coronal (left and right), and lambdoid (left and right) sutures in computed tomography (CT) scans of humans and five nonhuman primate species (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan troglodytes, Hylobates lar, and Nasalis larvatus).
Methods
Human ages are evenly distributed between 10 and 65 years of age, with an equal number of males (n=16) and females (n=16) in the sample. Nonhuman primates are all females, and the sample includes juveniles (n=6) and adults (n=34). Sutures were evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0: fused sutures; 1: no interdigitation; 2: low complexity; and 3: representing the highest degree of interdigitation and complexity).
Results
Based on ordinary least squares linear regression, we found no significant relationship between suture interdigitation and age in humans. Chi-square tests were utilized to assess sex differences within humans, species-level differences, and differences between humans and nonhuman primates across all five sutures. Humans exhibited a statistically significant greater degree of suture complexity than all five nonhuman species across all five sutures.
Conclusions
These findings indicate that human suture interdigitation is more complex than their closest living relatives (African apes) and other primates (Asian monkeys and apes). We theorize that this would enable subtle movement and serve to transmit forces at the cranial sutures from dietary or ethological behaviors, similar to the pattern observed in other mammals. While humans have a softer diet compared to other living primates, the uniqueness of human craniofacial growth and extended developmental period could contribute to the necessity for complex cranial sutures. More studies are needed to understand variation in human and nonhuman sutural complexity and its relationship to cranial motion.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference41 articles.
1. King, HH. Osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine. In: Seffinger, MA, Hruby, R, Willard, FH, et al., editors. Foundations of osteopathic medicine: philosophy, science, clinical applications, and research, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2018:885–905 pp. 2. Magoun, HI. Osteopathy in the cranial field, 3rd ed. Kirksville, MO: The Journal Publishing Company; 1976:174–5 pp. 3. Tobey, H, Lucas, T, Bledsoe, D, Mykins, M, Campbell, C, Berr, SS, et al.. Effect of osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine on an aged rat model of Alzheimer disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2019;11:712–23. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2019.121. 4. Henderson, JH, Longaker, MT, Carter, DR. Sutural bone deposition rate and strain magnitude during cranial development. Bone 2004;34:271–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.007. 5. Gibert, J, Palmqvist, P. Fractal analysis of the Orce skull sutures. J Hum Evol 1995;28:561–75. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1995.1042.
|
|