Citizen Needs – To Be Considered

Author:

Maas Franzisca1ORCID,Wolf Sara1,Hohm Anna1,Hurtienne Jörn1

Affiliation:

1. 9190 Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg , Würzburg , Germany

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we argue for and present an empirical study of putting citizens into focus during the early stages of designing tools for civic participation in a mid-sized German town. Drawing on Contextual and Participatory Design, we involved 105 participants by conducting interviews, using Photovoice and participating in a local neighbourhood meeting. Together with citizens, we built an Affinity Diagram, consolidated the data and identified key insights. As a result, we present and discuss different participation identities such as Motivated Activists, Convenience Participants or Companions and a collection of citizen needs for local civic participation, e. g., personal contact is irreplaceable for motivation, trust and mutual understanding, and some citizens preferred to “stumble across” information rather than actively searching for it. We use existing participation tools to demonstrate how individual needs could be addressed. Finally, we apply our insights to an example in our local context. We conclude that if we want to build digital tools that go beyond tokenistic, top-down ways of civic participation and that treat citizens as one homogeneous group, citizens need to be part of the design process right from the start. Supplemental material can be retrieved from https://osf.io/rxd7h/.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Communication,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Information Systems,Social Psychology

Reference60 articles.

1. Allen, M., Regenbrecht, H. and Abbott, M. 2011. Smart-phone augmented reality for public participation in urban planning. Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on – OzCHI ’11 (Canberra, Australia, 2011), 11–20.

2. Anastasiu, I. 2020. Humanising the smart city: Co-creation redefined in pursuit of systemic change. Queensland University of Technology.

3. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 35, 4 (Jul. 1969), 216–224. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.

4. Bicking, M., Triantafillou, A., Henderson, F., Koussouris, S. and Wimmer, M.A. 2011. Lessons from monitoring and assessing EC-funded eParticipation projects: Citizen engagement and participation impact. 2011 IST-Africa Conference Proceedings (May 2011), 1–8.

5. Bödeker, S. 2012. Soziale Ungleichheit und politische Partizipation in Deutschland. WZBrief Zivilengagement, 05 (2012), 7.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3